What is an ontological anxiety?

  • What is an ontological anxiety?

    Ad by CapitalOne Shopping

    Before you shop at Amazon Prime, read this.

    The dead giveaway that tells you when Amazon’s giving you a better price than other retailers.

    First, we must understand the meaning of the key terms: Ontology and Anxiety.

    Ontology:

    Ontology refers to the study of the things that exist. It is the science of being or reality. The word comes from the Greek terms “ontos” or “being” and “logos” or “theory, account.” Thus ontology is the “theory of” or “account of” being.

    Anxiety:

    It is often described as a state of helplessness, characterized by a loss of direction, “inadequate reactions, and a lack of intentionality. Anxiety is a state of uneasiness or tension that people experience under certain conditions.

    The relationship between Ontology and Anxiety:

    Anxiety is the result of a threat to the total ontological structure, to its essential and existential realms. Ontological anxiety is anxiety about nonbeing simply and directly. Nonbeing is experienced as the “no more” of being.

    Ontological anxiety is the anxiety reflected in the categories of space, time, substance, and causality. It is created by the threat of the nonbeing of the totality of being. In human existence, the total person as existing and becoming is threatened.

    Here are the conclusions from The ontological character of anxiety study:

    “Anxiety is ontological in character. It is ontological because it is the necessary concomitant condition of the fact and structures of existence. Man is faced with one basic threat-the possibility of non-being.

    In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In a relative form, he is threatened with personal death and with the failure of personal fulfillment-with the loss of being and becoming.

    Ontological anxiety has to do with the absolute threat of extinction and ontic anxiety with the relative threat to self-preservation and self-enhancement.

    If you found this answer useful, please leave an upvote.

    I was not acquainted with this term so I had to look it up to give some basis from which to offer an opinion meditation to many can be a romantic exercise, w the portrayals of meditation for the past years of my youth were mostly over exaggerated farces and fetishes. The practice of buddhism and the meditative arts while is a mind expanding practice in my opinion and experience should not bring undue existential anxiety.

    spending the time to examine your place in the universe while it can be vast and awe inspiring at times, The practice of Nichiren Buddhism which is “limitless and mystical simultaneously” at the same time (Ichinen Sanzen) it keeps our psyche firmly planted in the reality we need in order to function, the meditative arts is not a n esoteric aesthetic practice of austerity, The honored buddha did engage in these esoteric practices and thoughts in ancient India, he then discarded them to teach what is described in the Lotus Sutra and hence the legacy of the Nicherein Practice for ordinary humans like you and I.

    We conclude from our analysis of Tillichian and Rogerian anthropology that anxiety is ontological in character. It is ontological because it is the necessary concomitant condition of the fact and structures of existence. Man is faced with one basic threat—the possibility of non-being. In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In a relative form, he is threatened with personal death and with the failure of personal fulfillment—with the loss of being and becoming. Ontological anxiety has to do with the absolute threat of extinction and ontic anxiety with the relative threat to self-preservation and self-enhancement. From this condition there is no escape. Refusal to accept the inescapable results in neurotic anxiety, a nonessential concomitant of being which, therefore, can be removed. These distinctions are revealed by an ontological and phenomenological analysis of human existence that brings ontology and psychology into a complementary relationship.

    How does Grammarly (the grammar checker) work?

    From time to time, we hear from curious users who want to know more about the technology behind Grammarly. Where do all those writing corrections, suggestions, and enhancements come from? A team of magic elves? A squad of word-obsessed robots? A really, really busy human editor? Actually,

    The word ontological (from philosophy) is use as a qualifier. An ontological question is a question about existence.

    It is used in so many inappropriate places that it difficult to tell what or who’s existence and why existence is part of whatever it qualifies.

    The existance of God for example is a clear so to make an ontological argument for God is to write an argument for the existence of God

    So let’s use it to qualify anxiety…

    Does anxiety exist … – can’t be that because we know it does (we feel it, but are feelings real no? well they affect us …. ).

    Is it about the anxiety of existence – more likely of not existence

    so is it about dying … might be, but why use ontological – that makes no sense fear is real (yes it is – its triggered in the brain as a facility to make us act)

    Is it about why anything exists? Are we anxious about reality? (I think we would be much more anxious without it )

    Is it about the feeling of anxiety perhaps we should deny it and always feel secure rather than fear it

    … you understand the problem the qualified word can be a word without existence issues and still people will ontologicalise it

    It think it is about the existence of pretention if you want to sound pretentious shove the word ontological in front of something – no one will question it and sounds really …. pretentious.

    Computer scientists writing incomprehensible papers absolutely love the word…

    (answer: I believe it’s a meaningless term)

    One aspect of ontological anxiety not covered in other answers is the associated form of anxiety that deals with psychological introspection, whereby outwardly there appears to perfect serenity but existing inwardly there is singular total agitation within the mind and particularly the feelings of the individual suffering from introspective ontological anxiety.

    Deep within lies logic that is so persistent with unshakeable conviction everything of common association is subject to be classified as the threat to being while sometimes alleviation is calculated by the question – “did feeling cause this addiction ?, or did it come from the mind ? “.

    If introspective ontological anxiety is the result of a nervous disposition it could be thought of as innate, or if the anxiety is thought of as manufacted by though processes then it’s temporal.

    Moreover a third scenario now arises and the plot thickens with the question – “what if psychological introspective anxiety is an expression Divine Episteme similar to what Joan of Arc conjured up and felt ?, or did her understandings come directly from Divinity Himself ? “.

    Hummm, !!. In which case some sufferers of ontological anxiety in particular of a psychological introspective nature could be Prophets, but go unnoticed because serenity is deceitful.

    This is an answer gleaned from the web. It is about as lucid and intelligent as they get.

    The simple fact is that the Creator God, my Father, is calling you to accept the salvation bought and paid for by Jesus the Messiah. Included is the command to cast all your cares and burdens upon Jesus.

    The power of the fear of death and talked about below was solved by Jesus in securing our Salvation. He sets us free from the power of death.

    We conclude from our analysis of Tillichian and Rogerian anthropology that anxiety is ontological in character. It is ontological because it is the necessary concomitant condition of the fact and structures of existence. Man is faced with one basic threat—the possibility of non-being. In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In an absolute form, he is threatened with the total extinction of being. In a relative form, he is threatened with personal death and with the failure of personal fullillment—with the loss of being and becoming. Ontological anxiety has to do with the absolute threat of extinction and ontic anxiety with the relative threat to self-preservation and self-enhancement. From this condition there is no escape. Refusal to accept the inescapable results in neurotic anxiety, a nonessential concomitant of being which, therefore, can be removed. These distinctions are revealed by an ontological and phenomenological analysis of human existence that brings ontology and psychology into a complementary relationship.

    How can I become a data scientist?

    After being dubbed “sexiest job of the 21st Century” by Harvard Business Review, data science has stirred the interest of the general public. Many people are intrigued by the job and wonder how they themselves can become data scientists. There are so many tools, courses, and applications

    The Greek for being is “ onto” so ontological anxiety is the fear of not being. Some refer to this as existential anxiety, the fear of loss of existence. Once one has made peace with the fact that one will eventually die and possibly not exist in any form, then presumably this type of anxiety should lessen. Of course people of faith believe in a continued existence, so their anxiety about death may be assuaged, but not necessarily.

    ·

    View 1 Upvoter

    It’s something that’s indistinguishable from “a fear of death” in a mind that has no clue what, if anything, lies beyond.

    Frankly, it’s pretentious terminology contrived to legitimize observations by philosophers and psychologists of the simple emotions that accompany ignorance, the fear of the unknown, and the very natural fear of loss—the loss of everything known as death.

    At the expense of being highly ranked in the answer feed, this answer will bypass all the scholastic terminology from formal philosophy as taught in universities that, in my opinion, overly and unnecessarily complicates human nature.

    But then, it’s human nature that propels the intellectual vanity by which humans create entire fields of study to complicate what can be obtained by honest observation. And why? So that they might appropriate it to themselves for personal gain.

    Let me simplify that a bit: turn simple wisdom into a commodity with a fancy label and you can dispense it at a price. Standardize. Institutionalize. Capitalize.

    An illogical association at first sight, since ‘ontological’ refers to the material origin of things, and its opposite: ’epistemic’ to the way the mind looks at them. One might think that anxiety is rather the owner of the mind.

    But everything depends on the stage where we start the organization of things. Material ontology now extends to the mind, ignoring mind / matter dualism. Some see then the origin of the properties of the mind (including anxiety) as a consequence of the organization of the real and more precisely of the evolution of the living.

    But seeing anxiety only so would reduce it. Indeed, consciousness is able to consider its own anxiety and control it. It is not therefore a purely ontological property.

    In the end, the correct formulation is: there is an ontological face to anxiety, which comes from its evolutionary origins, and which imposes itself on the mind. There is also an epistemic face that allows us to modulate the effects of anxiety independently of its evolutionary roots.

    Think of ontology as the reality creating process within the Energy-Space-Time “force field” of the Grid’s Matrix. And now think of that word “Anxiety” as a conscious perceptual belief system imagining and perhaps projecting into the future force field the loss of something that … that belief system wants to keep … so that belief generates a particular Energy “Frequency” … a particular “Amplitude” and a particular “Density” we call an emotion and the host carrier (us) senses inside of our body … those Frequency patterns. Beliefs generating frequencies we define as anxiety.

    Does this make sense to you?

    Go watch On Personally Discovering “The Conscious Operating System of Your Mind (C:OS) – and the Programmed Belief Apps Running your Life”

    Facing futility of life and not knowing what is happening is one consequence.

    If an unknown agency of a higher order descended upon a lower order, there can be an invisible ominous collective nervousness. Perhaps such an event might remind us that we in comparison are simply bovine beast like that acts similar to the other beasts in this world.

    Ontological anxiety? Occurs when I am onto a logical solution to a philosophical conundrum when the thought arises: But what if there IS no logical solution to this dilemma? But then…I calm down by telling myself: Logic isn’t EVERYTHING!

Buy CBD Oil Ohio